Permanent record

RIR-2022 · Logged 13 July 2026

Evaluating Human-Centric Cybersecurity Training Effectiveness in High-Risk Organizational Environments and Remote Work Settings

Human factors are critical to cybersecurity, yet the efficacy of specific training interventions remains variable across different organizational structures. This study explores how targeted behavioral training impacts employee adherence to security protocols in high-risk environments.

Open to researchMBA suitableQuality 78/100Prior-standard auditP4 provenance
Report legal or privacy concern

In plain words

People working from home can be tricked into giving away access to their organisation's systems. Does security training designed around how people actually behave make staff in high risk organisations less likely to fall for it?

Primary research question

To what extent do tailored human-centric cybersecurity interventions reduce vulnerability to social engineering attacks in remote work settings?

Knowledge gap

What remains worth asking

It remains useful to test how specific human factor interventions correlate with measurable reductions in security breaches.

Potential contribution

Why it may matter

Improving human-centric security is vital for mitigating the most common entry points for cyber threats.

Academic placement

Academic fields and topic tags

CybersecurityOrganizational PsychologyManagement Information Systems

Study frame: Employees in organizations with high exposure to remote work and digital infrastructure. · Method signals: Experimental design, Surveys, Longitudinal analysis

Possible study pathways

One question, different levels

Professional master’s / MBA

Organizational risk management and human capital strategy.

Doctoral

Behavioral cybersecurity and socio-technical systems.

originality
Moderate
methodology
Moderate
Data access
Moderate
ethics
Advanced

Quality and audit

78/100 quality

Safeguard-based audit was not recorded under the prior standard.

  • Addresses the critical role of human factors in cybersecurity.
  • Open-access scholarly source and DOI metadata verified
Current safeguards were not recorded

This older record can be checked against the current standard on request. It changes only if every academic gate and independent safeguard passes.

Sign-in required · uses one AI credit

Provenance

Research Idea curation

  • DOI and bibliographic metadata independently resolved
  • Open-access status verified
  • The research direction is transparently marked as AI-inferred

The public contributor code contains no name or account email.

APA 7 source

Tikanmäki, I., & Ruoslahti, H. (2024). Human Factors Make or Break Cybersecurity!. Information & Security: An International Journal, 55(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.5522

Paper abstract and discussion context; AI-inferred direction

This is an AI-inferred direction. The source authors did not state it as a recommendation.

Open source ↗

This registered research direction is a starting point for academic work. It does not claim to be a completed proposal or to establish novelty.

Explore more ideas →