Permanent record

RIR-2030 · Logged 13 July 2026

Defining Meta-Responsibility Frameworks for Sustainable and Ethical Artificial Intelligence Ecosystems in Modern Organizations

This paper proposes a shift from isolated AI ethics to a systemic 'meta-responsibility' model, conceptualizing intelligent systems as interconnected socio-technical ecosystems.

Open to researchMBA suitableQuality 78/100Prior-standard auditP4 provenance
Report legal or privacy concern

In plain words

Instead of treating each ethical problem with artificial intelligence on its own, this idea looks at the whole system of people, organisations and technology around it. It asks what makes that system responsible.

Primary research question

What structural characteristics define a responsible AI ecosystem within complex socio-technical organizational environments?

Knowledge gap

What remains worth asking

Existing discourse often focuses on specific mitigation strategies rather than the holistic governance of AI as an integrated ecosystem.

Potential contribution

Why it may matter

Provides a theoretical foundation for developers and managers to align AI deployment with broader societal and ethical responsibilities.

Academic placement

Academic fields and topic tags

EthicsInformation SystemsManagement

Study frame: Applies to organizational governance and the design of responsible AI development lifecycles. · Method signals: Conceptual Analysis, Systems Thinking

Possible study pathways

One question, different levels

Professional master’s / MBA

Strategic management of ethical AI implementation in business.

Doctoral

Theoretical development of socio-technical governance models.

originality
Moderate
methodology
Accessible
Data access
Accessible
ethics
Advanced

Quality and audit

78/100 quality

Safeguard-based audit was not recorded under the prior standard.

  • Strong focus on organizational strategy and ethical governance.
  • Theoretical contribution to AI policy.
  • Open-access scholarly source and DOI metadata verified
Current safeguards were not recorded

This older record can be checked against the current standard on request. It changes only if every academic gate and independent safeguard passes.

Sign-in required · uses one AI credit

Provenance

Research Idea curation

  • DOI and bibliographic metadata independently resolved
  • Open-access status verified
  • The research direction is transparently marked as AI-inferred

The public contributor code contains no name or account email.

APA 7 source

Stahl, B. C. (2023). Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 7586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w

Paper abstract and discussion context; AI-inferred direction

This is an AI-inferred direction. The source authors did not state it as a recommendation.

Open source ↗

This registered research direction is a starting point for academic work. It does not claim to be a completed proposal or to establish novelty.

Explore more ideas →