Permanent record

RIR-2084 · Logged 13 July 2026

Arendtian Perspectives on Immaterial Labor and the Meaning of Work in Automated Societies

This research applies Hannah Arendt’s phenomenology to contemporary debates regarding automation and the future of work. It seeks to distinguish between labor, work, and action to address concerns about job meaningfulness.

Open to researchMBA suitableQuality 76/100Prior-standard auditP4 provenance
Report legal or privacy concern

In plain words

As machines take over more jobs, what makes work meaningful? This study uses the philosopher Hannah Arendt's ideas, which separate labour, work and action, to think about how organisations and labour policy could keep work meaningful.

Primary research question

How can Arendt’s conceptual distinction between labor, work, and action inform the design of meaningful work in an automated economy?

Knowledge gap

What remains worth asking

It remains useful to test whether Arendt’s critique of consumption can provide a practical framework for evaluating the societal impact of immaterial labor.

Potential contribution

Why it may matter

This study offers a philosophical foundation for rethinking organizational structures and labor policies in the age of automation.

Academic placement

Academic fields and topic tags

Business EthicsPhilosophyManagement

Study frame: Organizational management and labor policy in highly automated sectors. · Method signals: Philosophical analysis, Conceptual modeling, Literature review

Possible study pathways

One question, different levels

Professional master’s / MBA

Strategic management of human capital in automated environments.

Doctoral

Philosophical inquiry into the future of work and organizational ethics.

originality
Moderate
methodology
Accessible
Data access
Accessible
ethics
Moderate

Quality and audit

76/100 quality

Safeguard-based audit was not recorded under the prior standard.

  • Focuses on theoretical application to management.
  • Requires strong grounding in political philosophy.
  • Open-access scholarly source and DOI metadata verified
Current safeguards were not recorded

This older record can be checked against the current standard on request. It changes only if every academic gate and independent safeguard passes.

Sign-in required · uses one AI credit

Provenance

Research Idea curation

  • DOI and bibliographic metadata independently resolved
  • Open-access status verified
  • The research direction is transparently marked as AI-inferred

The public contributor code contains no name or account email.

APA 7 source

Waelen, R. A. (2025). Rethinking Automation and the Future of Work with Hannah Arendt. Journal of Business Ethics, 201(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05991-1

Paper abstract and discussion context; AI-inferred direction

This is an AI-inferred direction. The source authors did not state it as a recommendation.

Open source ↗

This registered research direction is a starting point for academic work. It does not claim to be a completed proposal or to establish novelty.

Explore more ideas →