Research Ideafind, shape or leave one
Share an ideaSign in

Permanent record

RIR-2070 · Logged 13 July 2026

Developing Standardized Metrics for Evaluating the Efficacy of Organizational Resilience Coaching Interventions

While organizational coaching is widely used to improve employee resilience, the lack of standardized evaluation metrics hinders comparative efficacy studies. This research proposes a roadmap for developing consistent assessment frameworks for resilience coaching.

Open to researchMBA suitableQuality 90/100Prior-standard auditP4 provenance
Report legal or privacy concern

In plain words

Many organisations pay for coaching to help staff bounce back from pressure, but there is no common way to tell if it works. This study would design shared measures to judge its long-term results across different workplaces.

Primary research question

What standardized metrics can effectively capture the long-term efficacy of organizational resilience coaching interventions?

Knowledge gap

What remains worth asking

The source suggests that there is no consolidated view on resilience coaching, so it remains useful to test standardized evaluation frameworks across diverse organizational settings.

Potential contribution

Why it may matter

Standardized metrics will enable organizations to better justify and optimize their investment in employee resilience programs.

Academic placement

Academic fields and topic tags

5.2Economics and business
Organizational PsychologyHuman Resource Management

Study frame: Corporate and organizational settings. · Method signals: Systematic review, Survey design, Longitudinal intervention study

Possible study pathways

One question, different levels

Professional master’s / MBA

Human capital management and organizational development

Research master’s

Psychometric assessment in organizational contexts

Doctoral

Evidence-based management and workplace resilience

originality
Moderate
methodology
Moderate
Data access
Moderate
ethics
Moderate

Quality and audit

90/100 quality

Safeguard-based audit was not recorded under the prior standard.

  • Explicitly calls for a roadmap for future research.
  • Open-access scholarly source and DOI metadata verified
Current safeguards were not recorded

This older record can be checked against the current standard on request. It changes only if every academic gate and independent safeguard passes.

Sign-in required · uses one AI credit

Provenance

Research Idea curation

  • DOI and bibliographic metadata independently resolved
  • Open-access status verified
  • The accessible abstract explicitly states the future-research direction

The public contributor code contains no name or account email.

APA 7 source

Sipondo, A., & Terblanche, N. (2024). Organisational coaching to improve workplace resilience: a scoping review and agenda for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1484222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1484222

Abstract (explicit future-research recommendation)

Open source ↗

Continue exploring

Related research ideas

RIR-3058

Do future-research suggestions in African management journals ever get taken up?

Future-research sections are meant to guide later work, yet they often mirror the study's own limitations, and little is known about whether anyone follows them. The idea estimates how often future-research statements in African management journals are taken up in later work, and whether specific statements are taken up more than limitation restatements.

RIR-3057

Where does gap-spotting enter a South African doctorate?

Published research questions in management are overwhelmingly framed as filling gaps in the literature rather than as challenges to underlying assumptions. Because this pattern has been established from finished texts, it is not known where in the doctoral and publication process a question changes form. The idea traces South African doctoral questions from proposal to thesis to journal article to locate that change and the actors and rules behind it.

RIR-3056

Mapping Strategy and Futures Methods: Relationships, Applications, Limits and Frontiers for Strategic Foresight

The contributor proposes a literature-based mapping of the methods associated with strategy and futures, asking what each comprises, how they complement one another, when they are used, and what is considered ineffective. The intended output is a structured guide for theorists and practitioners that identifies both existing resources and open research and practical frontiers for strategic foresight. The idea treats strategic foresight as a field whose methodological architecture can be described, compared and critically assessed.

RIR-3055

Transformative Business Process Redesign: Moving Beyond Automation to AI-Native Workflows

This research explores methodologies for fundamentally restructuring business processes to leverage the unique capabilities of artificial intelligence, rather than merely accelerating existing, legacy workflows. It seeks to identify the conceptual and operational shifts required to transition from AI-assisted automation to AI-native process design.

This registered research direction is a starting point for academic work. It does not claim to be a completed proposal or to establish novelty.

Explore more ideas →