Research Ideafind, shape or leave one
Share an ideaSign in

Permanent record

RIR-103 · Logged 13 July 2026

What makes community-owned batteries survive beyond the pilot?

Many community energy trials end when grant funding does. This project would compare the governance, tariff and maintenance choices behind systems that remain useful five years later.

Open to researchMBA suitableQuality 88/100Prior-standard auditP1 provenance
Report legal or privacy concern

In plain words

Many community batteries in low and middle income countries stop being useful once the grant money ends. This study would compare ownership, pricing and maintenance choices to see which ones keep a system running five years later.

Primary research question

Which ownership and maintenance arrangements best predict the long-term viability of community battery projects?

Knowledge gap

What remains worth asking

Technical evaluations dominate the literature while long-term institutional arrangements remain weakly compared.

Potential contribution

Why it may matter

Understanding durable ownership models could improve public and donor investment in distributed energy.

Academic placement

Academic fields and topic tags

2.7Environmental engineering5.2Economics and business5.6Political science
Energy systemsDevelopment economicsGovernance

Study frame: Low- and middle-income countries · Method signals: Comparative case study, Institutional analysis

Possible study pathways

One question, different levels

Professional master’s / MBA

Compare the operating models of two community battery projects.

Research master’s

Develop an institutional viability framework from multiple cases.

Doctoral

Test a new governance model longitudinally across countries.

originality
Advanced
methodology
Advanced
Data access
Advanced
ethics
Accessible

Quality and audit

88/100 quality

Safeguard-based audit was not recorded under the prior standard.

  • Explicit future-research recommendation
  • Strong applied contribution
  • Access to mature projects may be difficult
Current safeguards were not recorded

This older record can be checked against the current standard on request. It changes only if every academic gate and independent safeguard passes.

Sign-in required · uses one AI credit

Provenance

Research Idea curation

  • Submitted through a verified account
  • No external scholarly source is claimed

The public contributor code contains no name or account email.

Continue exploring

Related research ideas

RIR-3058

Do future-research suggestions in African management journals ever get taken up?

Future-research sections are meant to guide later work, yet they often mirror the study's own limitations, and little is known about whether anyone follows them. The idea estimates how often future-research statements in African management journals are taken up in later work, and whether specific statements are taken up more than limitation restatements.

RIR-3057

Where does gap-spotting enter a South African doctorate?

Published research questions in management are overwhelmingly framed as filling gaps in the literature rather than as challenges to underlying assumptions. Because this pattern has been established from finished texts, it is not known where in the doctoral and publication process a question changes form. The idea traces South African doctoral questions from proposal to thesis to journal article to locate that change and the actors and rules behind it.

RIR-3056

Mapping Strategy and Futures Methods: Relationships, Applications, Limits and Frontiers for Strategic Foresight

The contributor proposes a literature-based mapping of the methods associated with strategy and futures, asking what each comprises, how they complement one another, when they are used, and what is considered ineffective. The intended output is a structured guide for theorists and practitioners that identifies both existing resources and open research and practical frontiers for strategic foresight. The idea treats strategic foresight as a field whose methodological architecture can be described, compared and critically assessed.

This registered research direction is a starting point for academic work. It does not claim to be a completed proposal or to establish novelty.

Explore more ideas →